Partner at AKD Lawyers

Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Insurance Claims

Louisiana changed the way shared fault affects injury claims on January 1, 2026. House Bill 431 became Act 15 of the 2025 Regular Session and amended Civil Code Article 2323.

Under the new rule, an injured person who is found 51% or more at fault cannot recover damages. Someone who is 50% or less at fault may still recover, but the amount is reduced by their percentage of responsibility.

This change matters most when both sides blame each other, and the percentage of fault could fall anywhere between 40% and 60%. In those cases, even a small change in the percentage may decide whether the injured person receives compensation or nothing at all.

A New Orleans car accident lawyer can review how the rule applies to a specific collision, but the basic principles are explained below.

Key Takeaways

  • Louisiana’s 51% fault rule took effect on January 1, 2026.
  • A person who is 51% or more at fault cannot recover damages.
  • A person who is 50% or less at fault may recover a reduced amount.
  • Crashes before January 1, 2026, generally remain under the former pure comparative fault rule.
  • Photos, videos, witness statements, police reports, and vehicle damage can affect how fault is divided.

What Changed on January 1, 2026?

Before 2026, Louisiana followed a pure comparative fault system. An injured person’s compensation was reduced by their share of fault, but there was no percentage that completely barred recovery.

Act 15 changed that system by adding a 51% cutoff.

For crashes covered by the amended law:

  • Fault below 51% reduces the recovery.
  • A fault of exactly 50% still allows a recovery.
  • A fault of 51% or more completely blocks the claim.

For most car accident claims, the date of the crash determines which version of the law applies.

How Louisiana’s Old Fault Rule Worked

Louisiana used pure comparative fault for more than four decades.

Under that rule, an injured person could recover part of their damages even if they carried most of the blame. The amount was reduced according to their assigned percentage of fault.

For example, a person with $100,000 in damages who was found 60% responsible could still recover $40,000.

Even if someone found 99% at fault, they could technically recover 1% of their damages.

Fault reduced the value of the claim, but it did not eliminate the claim completely.

Before Louisiana adopted comparative fault in 1980, the state followed contributory negligence. Under that much stricter rule, even a small amount of fault could prevent an injured person from recovering anything.

Louisiana old pure comparative fault rule

How the 51% Fault Rule Works

The amended version of Civil Code Article 2323 creates a clear cutoff.

If an injured person is 51% or more responsible for causing the injury or loss, that person cannot recover damages. If the person is less than 51% responsible, the award is reduced by that percentage.

The law states:

“If the degree or percentage of negligence attributable to the person suffering injury, death, or loss is equal to or greater than fifty-one percent, then the person suffering injury, death, or loss shall not be entitled to recover damages.”

The calculation works like this:

  • 20% at fault: Recover 80% of the damages
  • 40% at fault: Recover 60% of the damages
  • 49% at fault: Recover 51% of the damages
  • 50% at fault: Recover 50% of the damages
  • 51% or more at fault: Recover nothing

For example, assume a person has $100,000 in proven damages.

If that person is assigned 20% of the fault, the recovery would be reduced to $80,000. At 49% fault, the recovery would fall to $51,000. At 51% fault, the recovery would be $0.

Article 2323 also requires juries to be told what their guilty decision means. Jurors will therefore know that assigning 51% or more of the fault to the injured person ends the claim.

Why Close Fault Disputes Matter More Now

The new rule has the greatest effect when both drivers may have contributed to the collision.

Under the old system, moving from 49% to 51% fault reduced the amount of compensation but did not eliminate it entirely. Under the new rule, that two-point shift can reduce the recovery to zero.

Close fault disputes often arise in:

  • Rear-end crashes involving sudden stops or alleged brake-checking
  • Left-turn accidents involving speed, signals, or right-of-way
  • Lane-change collisions involving blind spots or missed signals
  • Multi-vehicle crashes where several drivers may share blame.
  • Pedestrian accidents involving crosswalk use or driver attention
  • Intersection crashes where both drivers claim they had the right-of-way

In these cases, evidence does more than show how the accident happened. It may also keep the injured person’s fault below the 51% cutoff.

rear-end collisions

Evidence That Can Affect the Fault Percentage

Insurance adjusters, lawyers, judges, and juries may review several types of evidence before assigning fault.

Useful evidence may include:

  • Photos of the vehicles and the accident scene
  • Dashcam, traffic camera, or security camera footage
  • Witness names and statements
  • The police crash report
  • Vehicle damage and impact points
  • Skid marks and debris
  • Phone records when a distraction is suspected
  • Vehicle data showing speed or braking
  • Traffic signal records
  • Accident reconstruction findings

This evidence should be gathered as soon as possible. Video may be erased, skid marks may disappear, vehicles may be repaired, and witnesses may forget details.

Before and After the 2026 Change

Factor Before January 1, 2026 January 1, 2026, and Later
Fault system Pure comparative fault Modified comparative fault
Recovery at 99% plaintiff fault 1% of damages $0
Recovery at 60% plaintiff fault 40% of damages $0
Recovery at 50% plaintiff fault 50% of damages 50% of damages
Recovery at 40% plaintiff fault 60% of damages 60% of damages
Cutoff for recovery No complete cutoff 51% or more
Governing law Former Article 2323 Article 2323 as amended by Act 15 of 2025

How the Rule Applies to Multi-Vehicle Crashes

Fault in a multi-vehicle accident may be divided among several drivers.

For example, one driver may be assigned 40% of the fault, another 35%, and a third 25%. The total must equal 100%.

The injured person’s own percentage remains the key issue under the 51% rule. If that person is found to be 51% or more at fault, recovery is barred even when other drivers also contributed to the crash.

Multi-vehicle cases often require a closer review of vehicle positions, impact points, witness accounts, video footage, and the order of collisions.

The Filing Deadline Still Applies

The fault rule does not change the deadline for filing a lawsuit.

Louisiana Civil Code Article 3493.1 generally gives a person two years from the date the injury or damage occurred to file a delictual action. The two-year period applies to actions arising on or after July 1, 2024.

For a crash in 2026, both the two-year filing period and the 51% fault rule will usually apply.

An insurance claim or ongoing settlement discussion does not automatically stop the filing deadline. Waiting too long may prevent a person from taking the claim to court, regardless of who caused the crash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the 51% rule apply to crashes before January 1, 2026?

Generally, no. Crashes before January 1, 2026, remain subject to Louisiana’s former pure comparative fault system, even when the claim is settled or litigated later.

Can I recover if I am exactly 50% at fault?

Yes. The cutoff begins at 51%. A person found exactly 50% at fault may recover half of their proven damages under Article 2323.

What happens if I am found 51% responsible?

You cannot recover damages under Louisiana’s modified comparative fault rule. A finding of 51% responsibility bars the claim rather than simply reducing the award.

How does the rule affect a multi-vehicle accident?

Fault may be divided among several people. Your own percentage controls whether you can recover, making evidence about each driver’s actions especially important.

What does being at fault mean?

Fault means that careless conduct contributed to the crash. Speeding, distraction, following too closely, unsafe turns, and failing to yield may all affect the percentage.

How long do I have to file a Louisiana crash claim?

For crashes on or after July 1, 2024, the general filing period is two years from the date of injury or damage under Article 3493.1.

Get Your Free Consultation

Talk to a New Orleans Car Accident Lawyer

Louisiana’s 51% rule makes disputed-fault claims more difficult. When each driver gives a different account, evidence involving speed, traffic signals, right-of-way, vehicle damage, and impact points may be used to decide whether the claim survives.

Alvendia, Kelly & Demarest have handled Louisiana accident claims since 2003. Call (504) 200-0000 for a free consultation. There is no fee unless the firm wins your case.

Sources

In 2003, after being dissatisfied with the quality of legal care for victims of car accidents, Roderick ‘Rico’ Alvendia sought to establish a new firm focused on providing high-quality legal services to aid injured victims and their families. J. Bart Kelly, sharing Rico’s passion for upholding justice, joined the firm later that year, and established a partnership.

  • They helped me with every need possible. The back issues I had could have been much worse if they didn’t step in and help me. Bart, Megan, and all the people that work for this legal team are amazing. I would recommend them to anyone. Thank you all for helping me each step of the way. I can’t thank these people enough.

    - T. Gibson-Warren

  • I want to thank the whole team for all your help and persistence with my settlement. I truly appreciate.

    - A. Alfortish

  • Great experiences every time I need you guys. I always recommend your firm.

    - W. Young

  • Bart and his team were wonderful to work with. It was clear that their vision and determination to fight for our case, is why we were able to reach a settlement, where my previous attorney was not.

    - C. Perez

  • Bart Kelly and his legal team reevaluated my case after another attorney backed away from a legal challenge, I just want to say Thank You to mr kelly and his team for the hard work and dedication to my case to make it successful . Thank You

    - N. Gex

  • Attorney Kelly is an impeccable attorney. He has represented me extremely well. I was very, very, very pleased with the outcome of my settlement. He’s highly recommended … to give assistance to anyone. I thank him for his services and I’m super elated over the way he handled the case. He is a phenomenal lawyer.

    - S. Spears

  • I’ve learned the importance of having good coverage insurance, thanks to Mr. Kelly explaining everything to me. We do not hope or wait for accidents, but rest assured that I will call Mr. Kelly again if I need his services. Thank you.

    - Ann Zimmer

  • Being represented by Mr. Kelly and his legal team was a very awesome experience. They were very patient and they worked really hard in resolving my case. I would most definitely refer them to all my friends and associates. Thank you very much.

    - Nathaniel Bonney

  • I am very grateful for Mr. Bart’s assistance. He was very professional and fair. I never felt like a client with him. I always felt like a close friend. Also, I would like to thank everyone in the office for being friendly, kind, and for helping me.

    - Glac Mantuso

  • Just want to say thanks a lot because I received way more than I expected. You guys did a wonderful job of getting the max for myself and my family. Everyone I met or spoke to on the phone was really professional and nice. Once again, thanks a lot.

    - Jessica Quinn

  • J. Bart Kelly is the best attorney I have ever met. He is intelligent, caring, understanding, and knows how to protect his clients. I love his strong take-charge attitude to fight for what is right.

    - Teri Haas

  • My lawyer took the time to explain everything in a clear and concise manner. I’ve been treated fairly and with the utmost respect. I am very appreciative of all of the staff at AKD for their services.

    - James Barber

  • I am grateful for the way that my case was handled. Thanks.

    - Darryl Hill

  • Thanks to Bart and Meg. Fantastic group of people and team. Love you guys.

    - Claudine Hope

  • I was involved in a terrible accident and had a lot of serious injuries. I was so happy that Bart (and his team, including his nurse paralegal) was my attorney. The results were much more than expected as far as the settlement. Thanks.

    - Karen Bourgeois

  • I received exceptional service from the law office of Bart Kelly. He is a great attorney who cares about what you are going through, and I am very pleased with the outcome.

    - Melissa Sanchez

View all
SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION