Partner at AKD Lawyers

Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Insurance Claims

Louisiana changed how shared fault is calculated in injury claims, effective January 1, 2026. Under House Bill 431, signed by Governor Jeff Landry on May 28, 2025, as Act No. 15 of the 2025 Regular Session, Louisiana amended Civil Code article 2323 and adopted a 51% bar modified comparative fault system.

This matters most when fault is disputed, and the percentage could range from 40% to 60%. If your crash happened on or after January 1, 2026, speaking with a New Orleans personal injury lawyer can help you understand how the new rule may apply to your claim.

What Changed in Louisiana on January 1, 2026

Before 2026, Louisiana used pure comparative fault. That system reduced an injured person’s recovery by the percentage of fault, but did not completely cut off recovery.

HB 431 changed that for causes of action arising on or after January 1, 2026. Crashes before that date still fall under the older pure comparative fault rule that Louisiana followed for more than four decades.

Louisiana now follows a model used by roughly 33 other states, where recovery is barred once the plaintiff’s fault reaches a set threshold, commonly 50% or 51%.

How the Old Rule Worked Under Pure Comparative Fault

Under Louisiana’s pre-2026 pure comparative fault rule, an injured person could recover damages even if mostly at fault for the crash.

That was not always the case. Before 1980, Louisiana followed pure contributory negligence. Under that system, even 1% of fault on the part of the plaintiff could block recovery entirely. The 1980 move to pure comparative fault softened that rule. The plaintiff’s share of fault reduced recovery, but there was no cutoff.

So, under the old rule, a plaintiff found 99% at fault could still recover 1% of their damages from a defendant who was 1% at fault.

In practice, Louisiana juries and insurers worked with the understanding that fault reduced the claim’s value, but it did not automatically erase the claim.

51% Bar Works Now

How the 51% Bar Works Now

Amended art. 2323 creates a cutoff. If the injured person is 51% or more at fault, they cannot recover damages. If their fault is below 51%, their damages are reduced by their assigned percentage.

The statute says:

“If the degree or percentage of negligence attributable to the person suffering injury, death, or loss is equal to or greater than fifty-one percent, then the person suffering injury, death, or loss shall not be entitled to recover damages.”

La. Civ. Code art. 2323(A)(2)(a)

The calculation below the cutoff still works the familiar way. If damages are $100,000 and the plaintiff is 20% at fault, recovery is $80,000. If the plaintiff is 49% at fault, recovery is $51,000. At 51% or higher, recovery becomes $0.

The amended article also requires juries to be instructed on the effect of the statute when comparative fault is submitted to them. In other words, jurors will know that assigning 51% fault to the plaintiff ends the claim.

Get Your Free Consultation

What the New Rule Means for Close-Call Crashes

The new rule matters most when both sides have facts they can use to argue fault. A small shift in percentage can now completely change the outcome.

These disputes often come up in crashes like:

  • rear-end collisions where the front driver stopped suddenly or is accused of brake-checking
  • left-turn crashes where both drivers disagree about signal timing, speed, visibility, or right-of-way
  • multi-vehicle pile-ups where several drivers may share responsibility
  • lane-change crashes involving blind spots, missed signals, or disputed timing
  • pedestrian crashes where crosswalk use, visibility, and driver attention are all questioned

In these cases, the facts do more than explain what happened. They can move the fault percentage just enough to change the result.

Insurance adjusters have already begun using the new framework for 2026 claims. That makes evidence, including photos, witness accounts, video footage, police reports, vehicle damage, and details about how the crash happened, especially important.

rear-end collisions

Before vs. After: Louisiana Comparative Fault Summary

Factor

Before (1980–2025)

After (January 1, 2026 onward)

Rule type Pure comparative fault Modified comparative fault, 51% bar
Recovery at 99% plaintiff fault 1% of damages $0
Recovery at 60% plaintiff fault 40% of damages $0
Recovery at 40% plaintiff fault 60% of damages 60% of damages
Governing statute La. Civ. Code art. 2323 (pre-HB 431) La. Civ. Code art. 2323 (as amended by Act 15 of 2025)

FAQs

Does the new 51% rule apply if my crash was before January 1, 2026?

No. HB 431 applies prospectively, meaning it governs causes of action that arose on or after January 1, 2026. If your crash happened before that date, Louisiana’s pre-existing pure comparative fault rule still applies to your claim, even if you file or settle in 2026 or later.

What counts as being “at fault” for a Louisiana crash?

Fault under art. 2323 refers to Louisiana, where a person’s negligence was a proximate cause of the injury. It is stated as a percentage. Courts and juries may consider speeding, following too closely, failing to yield, distracted driving, and failure to adjust for other conditions. Each party’s share is allocated within the total 100%.

If I’m found exactly 50% at fault, do I still recover?

Yes. The statute bars recovery only when the plaintiff’s fault is “equal to or greater than fifty-one percent.” A plaintiff who is found to be exactly 50% at fault remains below the cutoff and may recover 50% of their damages.

How does the 51% bar affect multi-vehicle crashes?

In multi-vehicle crashes, fault may be split among several drivers. That can make it harder to predict the plaintiff’s final percentage. Careful documentation of each driver’s actions and a clear reconstruction can matter because even a small change in fault allocation may decide whether recovery is available.

How long do I have to file the plaintiff’s personal injury claim?

Louisiana extended the prescriptive period for personal injury claims from one year to two years under Act 423 of 2024. The change applies to actions arising on or after July 1, 2024. For crashes in 2026 and later, that two-year deadline applies alongside the 51% fault bar.

Conclusion

Louisiana’s shift to a 51% bar changes the stakes in shared-fault crash claims. Under the old rule, a mostly at-fault plaintiff could still recover a small portion of damages. Under the new rule, recovery ends once the plaintiff’s fault reaches 51%.

That makes fault allocation especially important in close-call crashes. When the facts are disputed, early evidence about speed, visibility, traffic signals, right-of-way, impact points, and witness accounts can affect whether the claim remains recoverable.

If you were in a crash in New Orleans or elsewhere in Louisiana on or after January 1, 2026, the attorneys at Alvendia, Kelly & Demarest, LLC have worked on Louisiana crash claims since 2003. The firm reviews how the 51% bar applies to the facts of the crash, whether fault allocation is disputed, and what evidence may affect the final percentage.

Sources

In 2003, after being dissatisfied with the quality of legal care for victims of car accidents, Roderick ‘Rico’ Alvendia sought to establish a new firm focused on providing high-quality legal services to aid injured victims and their families. J. Bart Kelly, sharing Rico’s passion for upholding justice, joined the firm later that year, and established a partnership.

  • They helped me with every need possible. The back issues I had could have been much worse if they didn’t step in and help me. Bart, Megan, and all the people that work for this legal team are amazing. I would recommend them to anyone. Thank you all for helping me each step of the way. I can’t thank these people enough.

    - T. Gibson-Warren

  • I want to thank the whole team for all your help and persistence with my settlement. I truly appreciate.

    - A. Alfortish

  • Great experiences every time I need you guys. I always recommend your firm.

    - W. Young

  • Bart and his team were wonderful to work with. It was clear that their vision and determination to fight for our case, is why we were able to reach a settlement, where my previous attorney was not.

    - C. Perez

  • Bart Kelly and his legal team reevaluated my case after another attorney backed away from a legal challenge, I just want to say Thank You to mr kelly and his team for the hard work and dedication to my case to make it successful . Thank You

    - N. Gex

  • Attorney Kelly is an impeccable attorney. He has represented me extremely well. I was very, very, very pleased with the outcome of my settlement. He’s highly recommended … to give assistance to anyone. I thank him for his services and I’m super elated over the way he handled the case. He is a phenomenal lawyer.

    - S. Spears

  • I’ve learned the importance of having good coverage insurance, thanks to Mr. Kelly explaining everything to me. We do not hope or wait for accidents, but rest assured that I will call Mr. Kelly again if I need his services. Thank you.

    - Ann Zimmer

  • Being represented by Mr. Kelly and his legal team was a very awesome experience. They were very patient and they worked really hard in resolving my case. I would most definitely refer them to all my friends and associates. Thank you very much.

    - Nathaniel Bonney

  • I am very grateful for Mr. Bart’s assistance. He was very professional and fair. I never felt like a client with him. I always felt like a close friend. Also, I would like to thank everyone in the office for being friendly, kind, and for helping me.

    - Glac Mantuso

  • Just want to say thanks a lot because I received way more than I expected. You guys did a wonderful job of getting the max for myself and my family. Everyone I met or spoke to on the phone was really professional and nice. Once again, thanks a lot.

    - Jessica Quinn

  • J. Bart Kelly is the best attorney I have ever met. He is intelligent, caring, understanding, and knows how to protect his clients. I love his strong take-charge attitude to fight for what is right.

    - Teri Haas

  • My lawyer took the time to explain everything in a clear and concise manner. I’ve been treated fairly and with the utmost respect. I am very appreciative of all of the staff at AKD for their services.

    - James Barber

  • I am grateful for the way that my case was handled. Thanks.

    - Darryl Hill

  • Thanks to Bart and Meg. Fantastic group of people and team. Love you guys.

    - Claudine Hope

  • I was involved in a terrible accident and had a lot of serious injuries. I was so happy that Bart (and his team, including his nurse paralegal) was my attorney. The results were much more than expected as far as the settlement. Thanks.

    - Karen Bourgeois

  • I received exceptional service from the law office of Bart Kelly. He is a great attorney who cares about what you are going through, and I am very pleased with the outcome.

    - Melissa Sanchez

View all
SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION