In 2019, a woman, Gemma Brushett, was injured while crossing a busy street. She claimed that the cyclist, Robert Hazeldean, failed to yield and hit her, causing her serious injuries. However, it was later discovered that the woman was texting and not paying attention to her surroundings at the time of the accident.
Such a case is an example of comparative negligence, a legal principle that can greatly affect the outcome of personal injury cases. The concept of comparative negligence is based on the idea that both parties involved in an accident may have contributed to the cause of the injury.
What Is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence is a legal concept used to determine the degree of responsibility each party holds in an accident or injury. It’s typically used in personal injury cases where the plaintiff seeks compensation for damages or injuries caused by the defendant.
In such a case, the court evaluates the actions of each party and assigns a percentage of fault to each person. The court will consider some factors, including the degree of fault or negligence on each party’s part. This percentage of fault is then used to determine the amount of compensation each person is responsible for paying.
For example, if the defendant is found to be 70% responsible for an accident and the plaintiff 30% reliable, the defendant would only be responsible for paying 70% of the damages.
Types of Comparative Negligence
The type of comparative negligence that applies in a case depends on the state in which the accident occurred and the case’s specific facts.
There are two types of comparative negligence:
Pure comparative negligence
The pure comparative negligence principle allows a plaintiff to recover damages even if they are primarily at fault for the accident. The goal of this type of negligence is to fairly allocate responsibility for an accident based on the degree of fault of each party.
Under this rule, a plaintiff only recovers damages for the portion of fault they are not responsible for, even if it’s a small percentage. For example, if a court finds that a plaintiff is 99% at fault and the defendant is 1% at fault, the plaintiff can still collect damages, but only for the 1% they are not at fault for.
States like Louisiana, Florida, California, and New York follow the pure comparative negligence rule.
Modified/partial comparative negligence
Most states follow this principle. It involves barring the plaintiff’s recovery based on the degree of fault. There are two kinds of modified comparative negligence:
- The 50% bar rule
Under this rule, if a person’s negligence is to be 50% or more responsible for an injury, they are barred from recovering any damages from the other party (ies).
- The 51% bar rule
This rule is similar to the 50% bar rule, but a person can still recover damages if their negligence is less than 51% responsible for their injury. In such cases, the amount of damages will be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.
How Does It Affect a Personal Injury Case?
Comparative negligence can significantly impact the outcome of a personal injury case. That’s because the plaintiff may not get what they were seeking or may only receive a portion of it if they are found to be partially at fault for the accident.
Moreover, the defendant may also be responsible for some damages, even if the plaintiff was mostly at fault. In some cases, comparative negligence can impact the credibility of the witnesses and evidence presented because both sides will strive to prove their innocence and allocate fault to the other party.
Here is how it works:
- Determining fault: The first step in a personal injury case is determining who is at fault for the accident. If the plaintiff contributed to the accident in any way, their degree of fault is assessed.
- Calculating damages: Once the fault has been determined, the next step is calculating the damages award. If the plaintiff is partially at fault, their damages award will be reduced by their percentage of fault.
- Allocation: Once the degree of fault for each party has been determined, the damages award will be allocated accordingly.
Since both parties have to prove their side of the case and demonstrate their degree of fault, the application of comparative negligence can also result in a longer and more complex trial process. These factors make it important for both parties in a personal injury case to have a solid understanding of comparative negligence and its impact on the case.
When Can I Still Claim Compensation Even if I Am Partly at Fault?
In some jurisdictions, like Louisiana, a plaintiff can claim compensation even when at fault. Louisiana has a pure comparative negligence system, which means the complainant can recover compensation as long as they are not found to be 100% at fault for the incident.
Under the Louisiana Civil Code CC 2323, a person is only partially responsible for an accident or injury if they could have done something to prevent it but did not. Even if the person is at fault in some way, they are still entitled to a portion of the compensation awarded to the victim. The only exception to the rule is if the other party intentionally causes the accident.
It’s essential to keep in mind that the laws regarding fault and compensation can vary by jurisdiction, so it’s best to consult with a qualified legal professional to understand the rights and options in a specific case.
Louisiana’s Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Claims
A statute of limitation is the deadline for a victim to file a personal injury claim. In Louisiana, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is one year from the date of the incident. The legal action taken should be one year from:
- The date of the accident; or
- The date the plaintiff reasonably discovered the injuries
It’s important to note that there are some exceptions to this general rule, such as in cases involving minors or claims against the government. In such cases, the statute of limitations may be extended, or different rules may apply.
For those unfamiliar with the intricacies of personal injury claims, it’s beneficial to delve deeper into what constitutes a valid personal injury claim. Recent incidents, such as the Fitbit recall due to burn hazards, highlight the importance of understanding the potential dangers in everyday products.
Moreover, even in construction, the significance of blueprints and the associated dangers at construction sites cannot be overlooked. For a broader perspective on legal matters, one can explore the legal advice section or even delve into various class action lawsuits that have been filed over the years.
If you have been dealing with a personal injury case, contact Alvendia Kelly & Demarest today at 504-200-0000 to schedule a free consultation.
- Bicycle Accidents
- Car Accident
- Case results
- Class Action
- Community Aid
- Hard Rock Lawsuits
- Insurance Claims
- Legal Advice
- Mardi Gras Accident Attorney
- Mass Tort
- Motorcycle Accident
- Personal Injury
- Premise Liability
- Recent News
- Truck Accidents
- Work-Related Accident
In 2003, after being dissatisfied with the quality of legal care for victims of car accidents, Roderick ‘Rico’ Alvendia sought to establish a new firm focused on providing high-quality legal services to aid injured victims and their families. J. Bart Kelly, sharing Rico’s passion for upholding justice, joined the firm later that year, and established a partnership.
They helped me with every need possible. The back issues I had could have been much worse if they didn’t step in and help me. Bart, Megan, and all the people that work for this legal team are amazing. I would recommend them to anyone. Thank you all for helping me each step of the way. I can’t thank these people enough.
- T. Gibson-Warren
I want to thank the whole team for all your help and persistence with my settlement. I truly appreciate.
- A. Alfortish
Great experiences every time I need you guys. I always recommend your firm.
- W. Young
Bart and his team were wonderful to work with. It was clear that their vision and determination to fight for our case, is why we were able to reach a settlement, where my previous attorney was not.
- C. Perez
Bart Kelly and his legal team reevaluated my case after another attorney backed away from a legal challenge, I just want to say Thank You to mr kelly and his team for the hard work and dedication to my case to make it successful . Thank You
- N. Gex
Attorney Kelly is an impeccable attorney. He has represented me extremely well. I was very, very, very pleased with the outcome of my settlement. He’s highly recommended … to give assistance to anyone. I thank him for his services and I’m super elated over the way he handled the case. He is a phenomenal lawyer.
- S. Spears
I’ve learned the importance of having good coverage insurance, thanks to Mr. Kelly explaining everything to me. We do not hope or wait for accidents, but rest assured that I will call Mr. Kelly again if I need his services. Thank you.
- Ann Zimmer
Being represented by Mr. Kelly and his legal team was a very awesome experience. They were very patient and they worked really hard in resolving my case. I would most definitely refer them to all my friends and associates. Thank you very much.
- Nathaniel Bonney
I am very grateful for Mr. Bart’s assistance. He was very professional and fair. I never felt like a client with him. I always felt like a close friend. Also, I would like to thank everyone in the office for being friendly, kind, and for helping me.
- Glac Mantuso
Just want to say thanks a lot because I received way more than I expected. You guys did a wonderful job of getting the max for myself and my family. Everyone I met or spoke to on the phone was really professional and nice. Once again, thanks a lot.
- Jessica Quinn
J. Bart Kelly is the best attorney I have ever met. He is intelligent, caring, understanding, and knows how to protect his clients. I love his strong take-charge attitude to fight for what is right.
- Teri Haas
My lawyer took the time to explain everything in a clear and concise manner. I’ve been treated fairly and with the utmost respect. I am very appreciative of all of the staff at AKD for their services.
- James Barber
I am grateful for the way that my case was handled. Thanks.
- Darryl Hill
Thanks to Bart and Meg. Fantastic group of people and team. Love you guys.
- Claudine Hope
I was involved in a terrible accident and had a lot of serious injuries. I was so happy that Bart (and his team, including his nurse paralegal) was my attorney. The results were much more than expected as far as the settlement. Thanks.
- Karen Bourgeois
I received exceptional service from the law office of Bart Kelly. He is a great attorney who cares about what you are going through, and I am very pleased with the outcome.
- Melissa Sanchez