Partner at AKD Lawyers

Practice Areas: Personal Injury

Premises liability in Louisiana covers more than just slips or trips. It focuses on how safe a property is and whether a hazard could have been prevented. If you ever find yourself unsure about what to do after an incident on someone else’s property, speaking with a New Orleans personal injury attorney can help you understand your rights and the laws that apply.

Understanding how Louisiana evaluates unsafe property conditions, visitor classifications, and the duties of property owners helps people make sense of how these incidents are handled.

This guide breaks down the key ideas behind premises liability in Louisiana, the most common hazard conditions, and the legal standards that influence fault and responsibility.

Overview of Premises Liability in Louisiana

Premises liability refers to the responsibility a property owner or custodian has to keep their space reasonably safe. This applies to grocery stores, apartment buildings, parking lots, public venues, and private homes.

Louisiana law expects property owners to identify hazards, repair unsafe conditions, and warn visitors when a danger cannot be fixed immediately.

The concept centers around unsafe property conditions in Louisiana, such as:

  • Wet or slick floors
  • Uneven or damaged walking surfaces
  • Poor lighting inside or outside buildings

When a hazard causes an injury, the question becomes whether the property owner knew or should have known about the condition and failed to act.

Falls are one of the leading causes of emergency room visits in the United States, with over 8 million reported annually according to the National Floor Safety Institute.

People often encounter hazards in everyday places. Parking lots with poor lighting, staircases with broken handrails, or stores with spilled liquids are common sources of incidents. Understanding these risks gives visitors a better sense of what Louisiana law considers preventable.

Duty of Care and Visitor Classifications

Louisiana law looks closely at the type of visitor involved. The level of responsibility owed may vary depending on why a person is on the property.

Invitees

Individuals entering a property for mutual benefit, such as shoppers or tenants. These visitors are owed the highest level of care, meaning the owner should inspect for hazards, correct issues promptly, and provide warnings where necessary.

Licensees

These are social guests or visitors with permission to be there. Property owners must ensure the premises are reasonably safe and address any known risks.

Trespassers

People entering without permission receive limited protection. Owners are generally expected not to intentionally harm them and to avoid reckless conduct.

Visitor classifications help determine whether a hazard should have been addressed and what steps the owner reasonably should have taken.

Premises Liability Cases

Common Hazard Conditions on Louisiana Properties

Many incidents result from hazards that could have been avoided with basic upkeep or routine inspections. Some of the most frequent unsafe property conditions include:

Slip and Fall Hazards

Wet floors, spills, recently mopped surfaces without signage, and rainwater in entryways often cause slip and fall incidents.

Trip and Fall Conditions

Uneven flooring, torn carpets, cluttered walkways, and loose tiles can create tripping risks.

Poor Lighting

Dim stairwells, parking lots, or hallways may reduce visibility and contribute to falls or security concerns.

Falling Objects or Structural Issues

Loose shelves, damaged ceilings, or poorly maintained fixtures may fall or collapse unexpectedly.

Negligent Security Hazards

Broken locks, lack of lighting, or missing security features can increase the risk of criminal activity.

Animal-Related Hazards

Unrestrained pets or inadequate fencing may lead to bites or injuries. These conditions often appear in apartments, stores, offices, or outdoor locations. Recognizing the types of hazards covered under premises liability in Louisiana helps people understand how these incidents are evaluated.

Get Your Free Consultation

Key Legal Standards Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 2317.1

Louisiana relies on specific statutes to evaluate property-related incidents. The most important is Article 2317.1.

Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 2317.1, a property custodian may be responsible for damages caused by a condition they knew or should have known about and failed to remedy.

This standard requires showing:

  • The condition created an unreasonable risk.
  • The owner had actual or constructive knowledge.
  • The owner failed to take reasonable action.
  • The hazard directly caused the injury.

This law applies broadly to public and private properties, covering everything from structural defects to temporary dangers. Another important statute is Article 2323.

Louisiana follows a comparative fault system under Article 2323, allowing responsibility to be divided based on each party’s role in the incident.

How Fault Is Determined: Notice, Knowledge, and Comparative Responsibility

Determining fault in premises incidents often depends on the owner’s knowledge of the hazard.

Actual Knowledge

The owner was aware of the danger.
Example: A store employee acknowledges a spill but fails to clean it.

Constructive Knowledge

The hazard existed long enough that the owner should have discovered it through normal inspections.

Open and Obvious Doctrine

If a hazard is considered obvious enough for a reasonable person to notice, fault may be reduced or shared.

Comparative Fault

Louisiana’s comparative fault rule reduces recovery based on the person’s share of responsibility. For example, distraction or improper footwear may influence fault percentages.

Understanding these factors helps explain how Louisiana evaluates unsafe property conditions, hazard notice requirements, and shared responsibility.

Premises Liability Claim

Time Limits, Evidence, and What to Consider After an Incident

Louisiana provides a limited window for addressing injury-related matters. Louisiana’s one-year prescriptive period requires most injury-related actions to be filed within one year of the incident.

Because conditions change quickly, early documentation helps clarify what happened.

Helpful forms of evidence include:

  • Photos or videos of the hazard
  • Maintenance or inspection logs
  • Witness observations
  • Weather conditions
  • Lighting conditions
  • Incident reports

Small details often help explain whether a hazard was preventable or foreseeable.

Premises Incidents on Government vs Private Property

Incidents on public property involve additional guidelines. While many principles are similar, government agencies often have stricter reporting procedures and shorter notice timelines.

Public property includes parks, municipal buildings, sidewalks, and government-maintained spaces. Agencies may have specific maintenance schedules, signage requirements, and inspection protocols that influence how hazards are evaluated.

Private property owners, such as landlords, businesses, or homeowners, are typically responsible for routine upkeep, hazard correction, and maintaining safe access areas.

Tabular Data: Common Property Hazards and Contributing Factors

Hazard Type

Common Locations Contributing Factors

Preventive Measures

Wet floors Stores, hallways Spills, weather Warning signs, prompt cleanup
Poor lighting Parking lots, stairwells Burned-out bulbs Routine inspections
Broken railings Apartments, porches Wear and tear Repairs and reinforcement
Uneven surfaces Sidewalks, walkways Weather, soil shifts Resurfacing, signage
Negligent security risks Public venues Broken locks, darkness Lighting upgrades, functional locks

Frequently Asked Questions

What conditions qualify as a hazardous property environment in Louisiana?

Hazards include wet floors, uneven surfaces, poor lighting, structural issues, or missing safety features that make an area unsafe for normal use.

Do property owners need to warn visitors about temporary hazards?

Temporary hazards usually require reasonable warnings such as signage, barriers, or clear communication until the condition is corrected.

How does Louisiana determine whether a property owner should have known about a hazard?

The law reviews inspection practices, how long the hazard existed, and whether a reasonable owner would have noticed it.

What role does comparative fault play in premises incidents?

Comparative fault allows responsibility to be shared, reducing recovery based on how a person’s actions contributed to the incident.

Are incidents on government property handled differently?

Government agencies often have stricter reporting rules and shorter timelines that differ from private property requirements.

Conclusion

Premises liability in Louisiana focuses on how hazards arise, how property owners handle risks, and how responsibility is shared when incidents happen. Understanding duty of care, property conditions, timelines, and key Louisiana statutes helps people make sense of how these situations are evaluated.

If you or someone you know has questions about a property-related incident or needs guidance, the team at Alvendia, Kelly & Demarest Law Firm is available to offer support and help you understand your options. Reach out today to discuss your situation and request a free consultation.

In 2003, after being dissatisfied with the quality of legal care for victims of car accidents, Roderick ‘Rico’ Alvendia sought to establish a new firm focused on providing high-quality legal services to aid injured victims and their families. J. Bart Kelly, sharing Rico’s passion for upholding justice, joined the firm later that year, and established a partnership.

  • They helped me with every need possible. The back issues I had could have been much worse if they didn’t step in and help me. Bart, Megan, and all the people that work for this legal team are amazing. I would recommend them to anyone. Thank you all for helping me each step of the way. I can’t thank these people enough.

    - T. Gibson-Warren

  • I want to thank the whole team for all your help and persistence with my settlement. I truly appreciate.

    - A. Alfortish

  • Great experiences every time I need you guys. I always recommend your firm.

    - W. Young

  • Bart and his team were wonderful to work with. It was clear that their vision and determination to fight for our case, is why we were able to reach a settlement, where my previous attorney was not.

    - C. Perez

  • Bart Kelly and his legal team reevaluated my case after another attorney backed away from a legal challenge, I just want to say Thank You to mr kelly and his team for the hard work and dedication to my case to make it successful . Thank You

    - N. Gex

  • Attorney Kelly is an impeccable attorney. He has represented me extremely well. I was very, very, very pleased with the outcome of my settlement. He’s highly recommended … to give assistance to anyone. I thank him for his services and I’m super elated over the way he handled the case. He is a phenomenal lawyer.

    - S. Spears

  • I’ve learned the importance of having good coverage insurance, thanks to Mr. Kelly explaining everything to me. We do not hope or wait for accidents, but rest assured that I will call Mr. Kelly again if I need his services. Thank you.

    - Ann Zimmer

  • Being represented by Mr. Kelly and his legal team was a very awesome experience. They were very patient and they worked really hard in resolving my case. I would most definitely refer them to all my friends and associates. Thank you very much.

    - Nathaniel Bonney

  • I am very grateful for Mr. Bart’s assistance. He was very professional and fair. I never felt like a client with him. I always felt like a close friend. Also, I would like to thank everyone in the office for being friendly, kind, and for helping me.

    - Glac Mantuso

  • Just want to say thanks a lot because I received way more than I expected. You guys did a wonderful job of getting the max for myself and my family. Everyone I met or spoke to on the phone was really professional and nice. Once again, thanks a lot.

    - Jessica Quinn

  • J. Bart Kelly is the best attorney I have ever met. He is intelligent, caring, understanding, and knows how to protect his clients. I love his strong take-charge attitude to fight for what is right.

    - Teri Haas

  • My lawyer took the time to explain everything in a clear and concise manner. I’ve been treated fairly and with the utmost respect. I am very appreciative of all of the staff at AKD for their services.

    - James Barber

  • I am grateful for the way that my case was handled. Thanks.

    - Darryl Hill

  • Thanks to Bart and Meg. Fantastic group of people and team. Love you guys.

    - Claudine Hope

  • I was involved in a terrible accident and had a lot of serious injuries. I was so happy that Bart (and his team, including his nurse paralegal) was my attorney. The results were much more than expected as far as the settlement. Thanks.

    - Karen Bourgeois

  • I received exceptional service from the law office of Bart Kelly. He is a great attorney who cares about what you are going through, and I am very pleased with the outcome.

    - Melissa Sanchez

View all
SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION